Today, the Court of Appeal upheld the High Court’s finding that the mother was in contempt of court for unlawfully denying access to the child’s father.
This was not just another file in our system.
When we took over the matter, the father had been alienated from his child for over 200 days (more than 1,000 days as at the date of the hearing). He had exhausted all avenues—waiting, hoping, pleading. And yet, what stood out most was his quiet strength: a steady, unwavering commitment to his child, and a deep willingness to put the child’s well-being above his own pain.
This case was taken on a pro bono basis, just one of many we undertake as part of our commitment to family justice. We did not seek compensation; only the opportunity to ensure that a good father was heard, seen, and supported.
Throughout the process, we acted with fairness and resolve. The mother was given repeated opportunities to comply with existing court orders and to act in the child's best interests. Despite these chances, the unlawful denial of access persisted. Ultimately, the Court agreed, this was contempt.
We are proud of the outcome.
Sometimes, justice doesn’t come with a price tag. Sometimes, it is simply the right thing to do.
Today, the law stood in support of a father’s love and a child’s right to connection.
We would also like to acknowledge our intern, Ms. Phebe, who was part of this journey. At our firm, interns are not merely observers, they are mentored, challenged, and empowered to witness the real heart of advocacy. We teach them not just the mechanics of legal practice, but the ethics that anchor it: Have a heart, never mislead, uphold integrity, and always remember that your every action is being watched and weighed.
This case is a reminder that behind legal processes are real families, real struggles, and real love. We remain committed to standing firm for fairness, especially when it matters most.
This article is prepared by Vhimall Murugesan